Why houses aren't like bananas (but a bit like potatoes)

Last week, the Australian Financial Review reported that the Victorian Treasurer Tim Pallas will head up a new national taskforce on housing affordability. There’s little detail on the taskforce, other than that it will focus on housing supply as the cure to Australia’s housing affordability problems. So it’s timely to revisit this post by Associate Professor Nicole Gurran and Peter Phibbs, Chair of Urban Planning and Policy from the University of Sydney from The Conversation on why houses are not like bananas (although this post from Matt Cowgill suggests they’re a bit like potatoes)

Read More
Outer sight, out of justice

A new approach is needed to delivering justice in the growing outer urban areas. This article by Shorna Moore, Senior Policy Lawyer at Wyndham Legal Service Inc, challenges narrow definitions of justice and argues for a 'precinct model'. The Outer Sight, Out of Justice Project uses critical stakeholder engagement, innovative public-private funding models and thought-leadership to challenge current policy thinking and processes.

Read More
#Collaboration (and what was said at the IRSPM Conference 2015)

Defining collaborative working and partnerships is a challenge, and was a central topic for discussion at the recent International Research Society for Public Management (IRSPM) Conference held in Birmingham on 30 March 2014. In this post, Paula Karlsson from  Glasgow Caledonian University shares her reflections on understanding collaboration and what it means in practice. While it is a challenge, it is one that many across sectors are grappling with. 

Read More
Outcomes: who decides?

There is plenty of debate about outcomes in the social services sector at the moment: how to identify them, how to measure them, how to use them for continuous improvement, and how to report back on them. Recently, Susan Maury, Policy & Research Specialist with Good Shepherd Australia New Zealand @GoodAdvocacy @SusanMaury, presented on an unusual approach to developing outcomes. Here she expands on the possibilities.

Read More
The evaluation theory tree

I have been working in the field of evaluation for the past eight years and I think what I have learnt most about evaluation in this time is that it is a crowded market. A lot of people are involved in the practice of evaluation. And while I have never conducted a scientific study, I have found it truly shocking how many practising evaluators know little to nothing about evaluation theory. Or know a lot about applied research methods and consider this an acceptable substitute for knowledge about evaluation.

Read More
The social invetment welfare state: the missing themE in social policy ebates

Following on from our latest Social Policy Whisperer piece, below Colin Crouch asks why social investment ideas haven't gain greater traction in political debates regarding social policy. While Colin writes about the UK context, his musing are just as relevant here in Australia and pick up on many of the themes Paul Symth raises on our blog. Colin Crouch is an emeritus professor of the University of Warwick. His latest book, Governing Social Risks in Post-Crisis Europe, has just been published by Edward Elgar. This piece originally appeared on the Politics and Policy Journal Blog

Read More
Fools Gold. RCTs are neither golden nor a standard.

As a professional evaluator, nothing gets my goat like reading the phrase: 'Randomised Control Trials (RCT's) are the gold standard of evaluation'. When I read this I always yell 'NO THEY ARE NOT' to my cat. (She doesn't care as she is a supporter of RCTs.) RCTs are a good evaluation method, but they are NOT the gold standard! There is no such thing as an evaluation method that is best and most appropriate across all contexts.

Read More
Social Policy Whisperer: Whitlam, Fraser and Ian 'Competition' Harper: From the Grand to the Grotesque

Mine was not the only heart warmed by the recent public celebrations of the grand contributions of Gough Whitlam and Malcolm Fraser to building a greater Australia. In tune with their era they understood the vital roles of democracy and social policy alongside the mixed economy in building a good society. And I will not be the only one frustrated by the grotesque banalities of the recommendations for ‘human services’ in Ian Harper’s - back to Hilmer!’ (1995) - report on competition policy. It is irretrievably locked in a market utopian policy time warp

Read More
Workfare in Australia: Indigenous Work for the Dole Policies

Following on from our post last week, below Jon Altman offers his thoughts on Indigenous Work for the Dole policies. Jon Altman is an emeritus professor of the Australian National University based at the Regulatory Institutions Network (RegNet), College of Asia and the Pacific, ANU. From 1990–2010 he was foundation director of the Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research.

Read More
#Lifestyle Choice, education & informed citizenry: a wake up call

Prime Minister Tony Abbott recently shocked and dismayed Indigenous communities and leaders with his "lifestyle choice" comments supporting the closure of up to 150 remote Indigenous communities in Western Australia - and galvanised the #SOSBlakAustralia protests on Twitter, Facebook and real life.

 Legal academic Kate Galloway says his comments should also serve as a wake up call to universities and for academics in all disciplines, and particularly lawyers who are at the frontline of justice and law making.

Read More
The cost of youth homelessness in Australia

In this blog, Dr Monica Thielking, Research Fellow at Swinburne University, takes us through the recently released report, The Costs of Youth Homelessness in Australia: Snapshot Report 1: The Australian Youth Homelessness Experience. This ground-breaking study offers profound insights into the experience of young people in Australia who are homeless and presents clear challenges for policy makers.

Read More
After McClure - 'upgrading' the public debate on welfare

The McClure Review provides us with the opportunity to 'upgrade' the welfare policy debate and start to genuinely frame welfare as social investment. Prof. Paul Smyth explores that there needs to be a real understanding of what welfare as investment actually means, with the right social policy nous and frameworks to ensure it is not another punitive measure to individualise social policy problems.

Read More